Keriakes v Chief Executive Officer, State Rail Authority [2003] NSWADT 191

Keriakes v Chief Executive Officer, State Rail Authority [2003] NSWADT 191

Disclosure of the names and identifying details of signatories to the internal workplace petition is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 1989 (NSW) because the information was obtained in confidence, its disclosure could inhibit future workplace reporting, expose signatories to risk of harassment or...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Joyce Keriakes; Respondent: Chief Executive Officer, State Rail Authority
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 August 2003
Procedural Posture
Review of Denial of Access to Documents (freedom of Information) / Final Decision on Merits, First Instance Tribunal (nswadt General Division)
Outcome
Agency's decision affirmed; access to names and identifying details refused.
Legal Topics
Freedom of Information, Exempt Documents, Confidential Material, Personal Affairs, Procedural Fairness
Administrative Law Information Law Freedom of Information Exempt Documents Confidential Material Personal Affairs Procedural Fairness

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 24 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Joyce Keriakes

Applicant

Chief Executive Officer, State Rail Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review of Denial of Access to Documents (freedom of Information) / Final Decision on Merits, First Instance Tribunal (nswadt General Division)

  1. 1 Whether the names and identifying details of signatories to a workplace petition are exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 1989 (NSW) on grounds of confidential material, personal affairs, or impact on agency operations
  2. 2 Whether disclosure would be unreasonable or contrary to the public interest

Ratio Decidendi

Disclosure of the names and identifying details of signatories to the internal workplace petition is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 1989 (NSW) because the information was obtained in confidence, its disclosure could inhibit future workplace reporting, expose signatories to risk of harassment or victimisation, and would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest. The exemption also applies as the deleted information concerns personal affairs and disclosure would be unreasonable.

Court Disposition

Agency's decision affirmed; access to names and identifying details refused.

Orders

  • The agency's decision not to release the names and other identifying details of the signatories to 'the petition' is affirmed.