Keriakes v Chief Executive Officer, State Rail Authority [2003] NSWADT 191
Disclosure of the names and identifying details of signatories to the internal workplace petition is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 1989 (NSW) because the information was obtained in confidence, its disclosure could inhibit future workplace reporting, expose signatories to risk of harassment or...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Joyce Keriakes; Respondent: Chief Executive Officer, State Rail Authority
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Review of Denial of Access to Documents (freedom of Information) / Final Decision on Merits, First Instance Tribunal (nswadt General Division)
- Outcome
- Agency's decision affirmed; access to names and identifying details refused.
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Exempt Documents, Confidential Material, Personal Affairs, Procedural Fairness
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joyce Keriakes
Applicant
Chief Executive Officer, State Rail Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review of Denial of Access to Documents (freedom of Information) / Final Decision on Merits, First Instance Tribunal (nswadt General Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the names and identifying details of signatories to a workplace petition are exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 1989 (NSW) on grounds of confidential material, personal affairs, or impact on agency operations
- 2 Whether disclosure would be unreasonable or contrary to the public interest
Ratio Decidendi
Disclosure of the names and identifying details of signatories to the internal workplace petition is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 1989 (NSW) because the information was obtained in confidence, its disclosure could inhibit future workplace reporting, expose signatories to risk of harassment or victimisation, and would, on balance, be contrary to the public interest. The exemption also applies as the deleted information concerns personal affairs and disclosure would be unreasonable.
Court Disposition
Agency's decision affirmed; access to names and identifying details refused.
Orders
- The agency's decision not to release the names and other identifying details of the signatories to 'the petition' is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment