J.S. Balharrie v. Water Administration Ministerial Corporation [1989] NSWLEC 163
It is not reasonably practicable for the applicant to obtain an adequate water supply for irrigation except by means of the subject licence; objections raised do not outweigh entitlement to the licence, and conditions should be imposed to balance interests.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['water Licence' 'irrigation' 'local Land Board Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether it is reasonably practicable for the applicant to obtain or make provision for a supply of water adequate for irrigation otherwise than in pursuance of a licence under s.13A of the Water Act 1912' 'Whether objections based on inconvenience, noise, erosion, and potential future use outweigh the entitlement to a water licence']
Ratio Decidendi
It is not reasonably practicable for the applicant to obtain an adequate water supply for irrigation except by means of the subject licence; objections raised do not outweigh entitlement to the licence, and conditions should be imposed to balance interests.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['Appeal against the decision of the Local Land Board of 17th June, 1987 upheld.' 'Exhibits may be released.' 'Costs reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment