JT v R [2021] NSWCCA 223
No miscarriage of justice arose because the trial judge gave a sufficient warning per s 306X prior to the complainant's evidence, the omission of a repeated warning on replaying the recording did not result in injustice, and the directions and preconditions for a majority verdict were appropriately satisfied under s 55F of the Jury Act 1977 (NSW).
- Parties
- Applicant: JT; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Conviction, Miscarriage of Justice, Evidence of Vulnerable Persons, Jury Directions, Majority Verdicts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JT
Applicant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge failed to direct and warn the jury as to the effect of the replaying of the complainant's evidence
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in invoking s 55F of the Jury Act 1977 (NSW) in permitting a majority verdict
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in the directions given to the jury on the availability of a majority verdict
Ratio Decidendi
No miscarriage of justice arose because the trial judge gave a sufficient warning per s 306X prior to the complainant's evidence, the omission of a repeated warning on replaying the recording did not result in injustice, and the directions and preconditions for a majority verdict were appropriately satisfied under s 55F of the Jury Act 1977 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Refuse leave under r 4.15 of the Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021 (NSW) to rely on grounds 1 and 2(b) of the grounds of appeal.
- Dismiss ground 2(a).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment