Regina v J.T.A.C. [2005] NSWCCA 345
The sentencing judge did not err in taking into account the particular vulnerability of the very young victims nor by referencing community protection, and the sentence imposed was within the proper exercise of judicial discretion given the seriousness of the offences and circumstances of the applicant.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Applicant: J.T.A.C.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentence, Juvenile Offender, Serious Sexual Offences, Assessment of Aggravating Factors, Preventive Detention, Manifest Excess
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
J.T.A.C.
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in assessing the vulnerability of the victims as an aggravating factor
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred by having regard to preventive detention in fixing the sentence
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive in the circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge did not err in taking into account the particular vulnerability of the very young victims nor by referencing community protection, and the sentence imposed was within the proper exercise of judicial discretion given the seriousness of the offences and circumstances of the applicant.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted
- Appeal against sentence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment