Jubilee Avenue Investments Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council [2008] NSWLEC 59
214 car spaces are sufficient for the present proposal; condition B24 should require piling and pier work for 10% increase over 214 spaces (to 235 total) should office and warehouse components be split in future; requiring more parking (as in B25/B24 prior wording) is excessive for current use; proposed amendments are appropriate.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jubilee Avenue Investments Pty Ltd; Respondent: Pittwater Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld in part
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Carparking Requirements, Condition Modification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jubilee Avenue Investments Pty Ltd
Applicant
Pittwater Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conditions B24 and B25 relating to carparking on the development consent should be amended or deleted
Ratio Decidendi
214 car spaces are sufficient for the present proposal; condition B24 should require piling and pier work for 10% increase over 214 spaces (to 235 total) should office and warehouse components be split in future; requiring more parking (as in B25/B24 prior wording) is excessive for current use; proposed amendments are appropriate.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld in part
Orders
- The appeal is upheld in part.
- The s 96 application to amend conditions of development consent No. N0007/07 is granted as follows: (a) Condition B24 is amended to require piling and pier work on level 1 be constructed to allow a 10% increase in parking area on that level for potential future separation of office and warehouse components; (b)...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment