Jubilee Avenue Investments Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council [2008] NSWLEC 59

Jubilee Avenue Investments Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council [2008] NSWLEC 59

214 car spaces are sufficient for the present proposal; condition B24 should require piling and pier work for 10% increase over 214 spaces (to 235 total) should office and warehouse components be split in future; requiring more parking (as in B25/B24 prior wording) is excessive for current use; proposed amendments are appropriate.

Parties
Applicant: Jubilee Avenue Investments Pty Ltd; Respondent: Pittwater Council
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal upheld in part
Legal Topics
Development Consent, Carparking Requirements, Condition Modification

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jubilee Avenue Investments Pty Ltd

Applicant

Pittwater Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether conditions B24 and B25 relating to carparking on the development consent should be amended or deleted

Ratio Decidendi

214 car spaces are sufficient for the present proposal; condition B24 should require piling and pier work for 10% increase over 214 spaces (to 235 total) should office and warehouse components be split in future; requiring more parking (as in B25/B24 prior wording) is excessive for current use; proposed amendments are appropriate.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld in part

Orders

  • The appeal is upheld in part.
  • The s 96 application to amend conditions of development consent No. N0007/07 is granted as follows: (a) Condition B24 is amended to require piling and pier work on level 1 be constructed to allow a 10% increase in parking area on that level for potential future separation of office and warehouse components; (b)...