R v Colin Maxwell Farrow [2014] NSWSC 1781
It is in the interests of justice for the trial to be conducted by judge alone due to the sole issue being mental illness, competing expert evidence, and serious availability issues of one expert that could render jury determination unfair.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application granted for trial by judge alone under s 132 Criminal Procedure Act 1986.
- Legal Topics
- ['judge Alone Trial' 'mental Illness Defence' 'murder']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial should be heard by judge alone under s 132 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 despite Crown opposition' 'Whether the interests of justice require a judge alone trial given the sole issue of mental illness and expert witness availability']
Ratio Decidendi
It is in the interests of justice for the trial to be conducted by judge alone due to the sole issue being mental illness, competing expert evidence, and serious availability issues of one expert that could render jury determination unfair.
Court Disposition
Application granted for trial by judge alone under s 132 Criminal Procedure Act 1986.
Orders
- ['The trial of Colin Maxwell Farrow on the charge of murdering Linda Jane Stevens is to be heard and determined by judge alone, pursuant to s 132 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986.' 'The Crown and counsel for the accused are to confer as to the most convenient course for adducing evidence of facts not to be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment