R v Abdollahi (No 10) [2013] NSWSC 483
There is just enough evidence in respect of the accused Shahsawari to make out the elements of the offences charged such that the matter should be considered by the jury; application for directed verdict refused.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Accused: Ali Abdollahi; Accused: Haider Hussein Ali; Accused: Mohammed Naim Amiri; Accused: Amir Manafi Bejoushin; Accused: Taleb Feili; Accused: Ali Haidari; Accused: Majid Parhizkar; Accused: Kamelledin Shahsawari; Accused: Medhi Viasi
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Directed Verdict During Trial
- Outcome
- Application for directed verdict of acquittal refused
- Legal Topics
- Judgment by Direction, No Case Submission, Directed Verdict of Acquittal, Sufficiency of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Ali Abdollahi
Accused
Haider Hussein Ali
Accused
Mohammed Naim Amiri
Accused
Amir Manafi Bejoushin
Accused
Taleb Feili
Accused
Ali Haidari
Accused
Majid Parhizkar
Accused
Kamelledin Shahsawari
Accused
Medhi Viasi
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Directed Verdict During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the evidence taken at its highest could satisfy a jury beyond reasonable doubt
- 2 Whether there is sufficient evidence to make out the elements of the offences charged
Ratio Decidendi
There is just enough evidence in respect of the accused Shahsawari to make out the elements of the offences charged such that the matter should be considered by the jury; application for directed verdict refused.
Court Disposition
Application for directed verdict of acquittal refused
Orders
- Application is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment