Cowan v Lai [2014] NSWSC 1143
Mr Lai, as trustee, would be justified in compromising the proceedings on the terms of settlement embodied in the Short Minutes of Order and the further terms agreed between the parties as referred to in paragraph 22 of the Statement of Facts. The Court gives judicial advice accordingly under s 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW).
- Parties
- First Plaintiff/first Cross Defendant: Joanne Rebecca Cowan; Second Plaintiff/second Cross Defendant: Crystal Cowan; Defendant/cross Claimant: Mark Bartholomew Lai
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Advice Under Trustee Act / Judicial Advice on Proposed Compromise/settlement
- Outcome
- Judicial advice given that the trustee would be justified in compromising proceedings on the proposed terms.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Advice to Trustee, Compromise of Proceedings, Trust Management, Variation and Rectification of Mortgage, Interests of Minor Beneficiaries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joanne Rebecca Cowan
First Plaintiff/first Cross Defendant
Crystal Cowan
Second Plaintiff/second Cross Defendant
Mark Bartholomew Lai
Defendant/cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Advice Under Trustee Act / Judicial Advice on Proposed Compromise/settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trustee (Mr Lai) would be justified in compromising proceedings regarding the mortgage and trust on the proposed settlement terms
- 2 Whether the mortgage accords with the Financial Agreement
- 3 Whether Mr Lai has the power to compromise or vary the mortgage under the trustee powers and statutory provisions
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Lai, as trustee, would be justified in compromising the proceedings on the terms of settlement embodied in the Short Minutes of Order and the further terms agreed between the parties as referred to in paragraph 22 of the Statement of Facts. The Court gives judicial advice accordingly under s 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Judicial advice given that the trustee would be justified in compromising proceedings on the proposed terms.
Orders
- The Court advises pursuant to s 63 of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) that the defendant would be justified in compromising the proceedings on the terms of settlement embodied in the Short Minutes of Order and the further terms agreed between the parties as referred to in paragraph 22 of the Statement of Facts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment