R v Quinn; Ex parte Consolidated Foods Corporation [1977] HCA 62

R v Quinn; Ex parte Consolidated Foods Corporation [1977] HCA 62

The power conferred on the Registrar under s. 23(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1955 (Cth) to remove a trade mark from the register for non-use is administrative, not judicial, in character; therefore, it may constitutionally be exercised by the Registrar without offending the separation of powers in the Constitution.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Application for Prohibition (order Nisi) / Return of Order Nisi—final Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed. Order nisi discharged.
Legal Topics
['judicial Power of the Commonwealth' 'administrative Power of Statutory Officers' 'removal of Trade Marks for Non Use' 'separation of Powers' 'validity of S. 23 Trade Marks Act 1955 (cth)']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Prohibition (order Nisi) / Return of Order Nisi—final Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether s. 23(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1955 (Cth) conferring power on the Registrar to remove trade marks involves the exercise of judicial power of the Commonwealth and is therefore invalid under the Constitution.']

Ratio Decidendi

The power conferred on the Registrar under s. 23(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1955 (Cth) to remove a trade mark from the register for non-use is administrative, not judicial, in character; therefore, it may constitutionally be exercised by the Registrar without offending the separation of powers in the Constitution.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed. Order nisi discharged.

Orders

  • ['Order nisi discharged.' "Prosecutor to pay respondents' costs including reserved costs."]