R v Quinn; Ex parte Consolidated Foods Corporation [1977] HCA 62
The power conferred on the Registrar under s. 23(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1955 (Cth) to remove a trade mark from the register for non-use is administrative, not judicial, in character; therefore, it may constitutionally be exercised by the Registrar without offending the separation of powers in the Constitution.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Prohibition (order Nisi) / Return of Order Nisi—final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed. Order nisi discharged.
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Power of the Commonwealth' 'administrative Power of Statutory Officers' 'removal of Trade Marks for Non Use' 'separation of Powers' 'validity of S. 23 Trade Marks Act 1955 (cth)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Prohibition (order Nisi) / Return of Order Nisi—final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s. 23(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1955 (Cth) conferring power on the Registrar to remove trade marks involves the exercise of judicial power of the Commonwealth and is therefore invalid under the Constitution.']
Ratio Decidendi
The power conferred on the Registrar under s. 23(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1955 (Cth) to remove a trade mark from the register for non-use is administrative, not judicial, in character; therefore, it may constitutionally be exercised by the Registrar without offending the separation of powers in the Constitution.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed. Order nisi discharged.
Orders
- ['Order nisi discharged.' "Prosecutor to pay respondents' costs including reserved costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment