DJS16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 254
The Tribunal's impugned findings were open to it on the evidence and were not illogical, irrational, or legally unreasonable. Differences in fact-finding approaches between Tribunal and delegate did not amount to jurisdictional error. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Federal Court of Australia – Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'irrationality' 'legal Unreasonableness' 'protection Visa' 'fact Finding' 'domestic Violence' 'custody' 'refugee Status']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Federal Court of Australia – Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Tribunal's findings were irrational or legally unreasonable" 'Whether Tribunal erred in fact-finding regarding protection visa refusal' "Whether Tribunal's findings constitute jurisdictional error"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's impugned findings were open to it on the evidence and were not illogical, irrational, or legally unreasonable. Differences in fact-finding approaches between Tribunal and delegate did not amount to jurisdictional error. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The first appellant pay the first respondent's costs, including reserved costs, to be fixed by way of a lump sum." 'On or before 13 March 2019, the parties are to file a joint note informing the Court whether or not agreement on costs (including reserved costs), and any lump sum figures...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment