MZZXJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1210
Leave to raise the new ground under s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) should be refused because there was no adequate explanation for not raising it below and it had negligible prospects of success; accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.
- Parties
- First Appellant: MZZXJ; Second Appellant: MZZXK; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Regarding Judicial Review of the Tribunal's Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Appeal, Jurisdictional Error, Leave to Raise New Grounds, Migration Act 1958 (cth) S 424 a
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MZZXJ
First Appellant
MZZXK
Second Appellant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Regarding Judicial Review of the Tribunal's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to raise a new ground under s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's decision involved jurisdictional error for not disclosing adverse information under s 424A
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to raise the new ground under s 424A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) should be refused because there was no adequate explanation for not raising it below and it had negligible prospects of success; accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed.
- The appellants pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment