Ward v Mobile Innovations Limited [2002] NSWIRComm 28

Ward v Mobile Innovations Limited [2002] NSWIRComm 28

The applicant was not constructively dismissed as the respondent's conduct did not compel or unduly influence her resignation; the monitoring and performance management were reasonable, and the resignation was a conscious decision by the applicant, thus no intervention of the Commission was warranted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 March 2002
Procedural Posture
Application Pursuant to S 84 Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['constructive Dismissal' 'mutual Good Faith' 'work Performance Management' 'termination of Employment']
['employment Law' 'industrial Relations'] ['constructive Dismissal' 'mutual Good Faith' 'work Performance Management' 'termination of Employment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Pursuant to S 84 Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether resignation amounted to constructive dismissal' 'Whether employer by its conduct compelled or unduly influenced resignation' 'Whether employer acted in good faith as a contractual partner']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant was not constructively dismissed as the respondent's conduct did not compel or unduly influence her resignation; the monitoring and performance management were reasonable, and the resignation was a conscious decision by the applicant, thus no intervention of the Commission was warranted.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['Application dismissed']