Odlum v Friend & Anor [2022] NSWSC 574
The Court found the defendants exercised due care and skill in their advice regarding the costs offers. The plaintiff was adequately informed of the risks, chose not to accept the offers, and causation was not established as she would not have accepted advice to settle even if given differently. Accordingly, there was no breach of duty or causative loss.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Judith Anne Odlum; First Defendant: Stephen James Friend trading as Friend and Co Lawyers; Second Defendant: Andrew James Paterson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the defendants.
- Legal Topics
- Lawyer and Client, Advice About Settlement, Costs Consequences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Judith Anne Odlum
Plaintiff
Stephen James Friend trading as Friend and Co Lawyers
First Defendant
Andrew James Paterson
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants were negligent in advising the plaintiff about costs offers made by her former partner after judgment in de facto property proceedings
- 2 Whether the defendants breached their duty of care or engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct under the Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW)
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the defendants exercised due care and skill in their advice regarding the costs offers. The plaintiff was adequately informed of the risks, chose not to accept the offers, and causation was not established as she would not have accepted advice to settle even if given differently. Accordingly, there was no breach of duty or causative loss.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the defendants.
Orders
- Judgment for the first and second defendants.
- Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment