Watt v Intercultural Management Services Pty Ltd [1996] IRCA 518

Watt v Intercultural Management Services Pty Ltd [1996] IRCA 518

The applicant's conduct amounted to acceptance of a probationary period determined in advance and for a reasonable duration; she was therefore excluded from the operation of the Act by Regulation 30B(1)(c), depriving the Court of jurisdiction.

Parties
Applicant: Judith Watt; Respondent: Intercultural Management Services Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 November 1996
Procedural Posture
Application Under S170 EA Industrial Relations Act 1988 for Unlawful Termination / Review of Judicial Registrar's Decision
Outcome
Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction; previous order set aside.
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Probationary Employment, Jurisdictional Competence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Judith Watt

Applicant

Intercultural Management Services Pty Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application Under S170 EA Industrial Relations Act 1988 for Unlawful Termination / Review of Judicial Registrar's Decision

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was excluded from the operation of Division 3 Part VIA of the Industrial Relations Act 1988
  2. 2 Whether a probationary period formed part of the applicant's contract of employment and was determined in advance
  3. 3 Whether the period of probation was reasonable

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's conduct amounted to acceptance of a probationary period determined in advance and for a reasonable duration; she was therefore excluded from the operation of the Act by Regulation 30B(1)(c), depriving the Court of jurisdiction.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction; previous order set aside.

Orders

  • The order of Judicial Registrar Millane dated 29 February 1996 be set aside.
  • The application be dismissed.