Miller v Miller; Estate Paul Lindo Miller [2000] NSWSC 767
The plaintiff satisfied the Court that the deceased knew and approved of the gift and that it was made freely and voluntarily, thus the requirements of s 13(2)(c) of the Wills Probate and Administration Act, 1898 were met and administration with the will annexed should be granted to the plaintiff.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['attesting Witness' 'beneficiary Under Will' 'undue Influence' 'knowledge and Approval' 'freely and Voluntarily Given Gift']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Probate Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a beneficial gift under a will to an attesting witness is invalid under s 13 of the Wills Probate and Administration Act 1898' 'Whether the Court should uphold the gift to the plaintiff under s 13(2)(c) of the Act']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff satisfied the Court that the deceased knew and approved of the gift and that it was made freely and voluntarily, thus the requirements of s 13(2)(c) of the Wills Probate and Administration Act, 1898 were met and administration with the will annexed should be granted to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- ['Order that administration with the will annexed of the estate of Paul Lindo Miller be granted to the plaintiff.' 'Refer the matter to the Registrar to complete the grant.' 'Make declaration 2(a) and 2(b) in the summons of 1 August 1997.' 'Order that the plaintiff pay the costs of the defendants.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment