Levy v Bablis [2012] NSWCA 147
No material change in circumstances was demonstrated to justify varying the security for costs order. The stay on proceedings should remain until security is provided, consistent with the manifest intention of the original and subsequent orders. The alleged mischaracterisation of certain orders as consent orders was immaterial to the decision and did not warrant correction under the slip rule.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Oral Application for Variation of Earlier Orders
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'variation of Orders' 'stay of Proceedings' 'slip Rule']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Oral Application for Variation of Earlier Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the existing orders concerning security for costs should be varied to reduce the required amount' 'Whether a stay flowing from the security for costs order should be lifted or relaxed to allow inspection of subpoenaed documents' 'Whether the judgment of 8 May 2012 wrongly described certain orders as consent orders, requiring correction under the slip rule']
Ratio Decidendi
No material change in circumstances was demonstrated to justify varying the security for costs order. The stay on proceedings should remain until security is provided, consistent with the manifest intention of the original and subsequent orders. The alleged mischaracterisation of certain orders as consent orders was immaterial to the decision and did not warrant correction under the slip rule.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The motion is dismissed with costs.' 'Liberty to apply is granted.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment