In the matter of Allfunds Australia Pty Limited [2016] NSWSC 1965
Leave under s 459S was refused because the defendant did not establish a serious question to be tried that Allfunds Australia Pty Limited was not the contracting party or that the costs were not due and payable, gave no explanation for failing to apply under s 459G to set aside or vary the demand, and did not adduce sufficient evidence to satisfy the Court that the grounds sought to be raised were material to proving solvency.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up in Insolvency; Creditor's Statutory Demand / Interlocutory Application for Leave Under (cth) Corporations Act 2001, S 459 S
- Outcome
- Interlocutory process dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ["creditor's Statutory Demand" 'winding Up in Insolvency' 'leave to Challenge Standing and Indebtedness' 'misnomer of Corporate Identity' 'bill of Costs' 'solvency']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Winding Up in Insolvency; Creditor's Statutory Demand / Interlocutory Application for Leave Under (cth) Corporations Act 2001, S 459 S
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether leave should be granted under (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 459S to challenge the plaintiff's standing as creditor and the indebtedness claimed." 'Whether there was a serious question to be tried that Allfunds Australia Pty Limited was not the contracting party or debtor to the plaintiff.' 'Whether there was a serious question to be tried that the debt was not payable because no bill of costs had been given to Allfunds Australia Pty Limited.' 'Whether there was a sufficient explanation for the failure to apply within the time permitted by (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 459G.' 'Whether the grounds sought to be raised were material to proving solvency.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave under s 459S was refused because the defendant did not establish a serious question to be tried that Allfunds Australia Pty Limited was not the contracting party or that the costs were not due and payable, gave no explanation for failing to apply under s 459G to set aside or vary the demand, and did not adduce sufficient evidence to satisfy the Court that the grounds sought to be raised were material to proving solvency.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory process dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The interlocutory process be dismissed, with costs assessed in the sum of $5,500.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment