Duthie v Mosman Council [2016] NSWLEC 1020
Having been satisfied that the agreement reached under s 34(3) was such that the Court could have made in proper exercise of its functions, the presiding Commissioner was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement and set out the terms in writing.
- Parties
- Applicant: Julie Duthie; Respondent: Mosman Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Proceedings disposed of by consent orders under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979, giving effect to the parties' agreement.
- Legal Topics
- Conciliation Conference, Agreement Between Parties, Orders Under S 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julie Duthie
Applicant
Mosman Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 could be reached and orders made accordingly
Ratio Decidendi
Having been satisfied that the agreement reached under s 34(3) was such that the Court could have made in proper exercise of its functions, the presiding Commissioner was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement and set out the terms in writing.
Court Disposition
Proceedings disposed of by consent orders under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979, giving effect to the parties' agreement.
Orders
- Final orders to give effect to the agreement were made (accessible separately as referred to in the judgment).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment