Torre v Jonamill [2002] NSWSC 152
The unregistered mortgage and the unregistered variations operated in equity and as deeds, but the variations increasing the "principal sum" did not acknowledge an actual indebtedness of $100,000. They increased the amount for which the mortgage was available as security, while the secured liability remained the actual balance owing within the "all moneys" categories. Because Ms Torre failed to prove a fixed debt of $100,000, an inquiry was required to ascertain the sum actually owing at completion and to determine the disposition of the fund.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Division Proceedings Concerning Competing Claims to a Fund Arising From an Unregistered Mortgage and Judgment Execution / Judgment After Hearing; Orders Made Referring Inquiries to a Master
- Outcome
- Inquiry ordered; Ms Torre ordered to pay the first defendant's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['all Moneys Mortgage' 'unregistered Torrens Title Mortgage' 'variation of Mortgage' 'equitable Mortgage' 'judgment Creditor Priority' 'inquiry as to Secured Debt']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Proceedings Concerning Competing Claims to a Fund Arising From an Unregistered Mortgage and Judgment Execution / Judgment After Hearing; Orders Made Referring Inquiries to a Master
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Ms Torre held an equitable mortgage over the undivided half share of Mr Briand and Mrs Briand in the Summerland Point property.' 'Whether unregistered instruments varying an unregistered mortgage of Torrens title land operated as deeds despite not being registered.' 'Whether the instruments increasing the "principal sum" to $100,000 established a fixed and certain debt of $100,000 secured by the mortgage, or merely increased the maximum amount for which the mortgage was available as security.' 'What disposition should be made of the fund held by the second and third defendants.']
Ratio Decidendi
The unregistered mortgage and the unregistered variations operated in equity and as deeds, but the variations increasing the "principal sum" did not acknowledge an actual indebtedness of $100,000. They increased the amount for which the mortgage was available as security, while the secured liability remained the actual balance owing within the "all moneys" categories. Because Ms Torre failed to prove a fixed debt of $100,000, an inquiry was required to ascertain the sum actually owing at completion and to determine the disposition of the fund.
Court Disposition
Inquiry ordered; Ms Torre ordered to pay the first defendant's costs.
Orders
- ['There be referred to a Master for inquiry and determination the sum, if any, which was, at 24 August 2001, the aggregate of all moneys owing or payable by either or both of Jacques Briand and Marie Josephine Briand to Julie Torre, being moneys within the various descriptions in paragraphs (a) to (e) of clause 1A...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment