He Zhang v Law Enforcement Conduct Commission [2024] NSWCATAD 158
The applicant's access application is not valid because the information requested relates to the complaint handling and investigative functions of the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission and is therefore excluded information under clause 2 of Schedule 2 of the GIPA Act; the Tribunal is satisfied the decision under review is correct and preferable.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Decision
- Outcome
- The decision under review is affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['excluded Information' 'invalid Application' 'public Interest in Disclosure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the information sought by the applicant is 'excluded information' under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW)" 'Whether the access application is valid under section 43 of the GIPA Act']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's access application is not valid because the information requested relates to the complaint handling and investigative functions of the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission and is therefore excluded information under clause 2 of Schedule 2 of the GIPA Act; the Tribunal is satisfied the decision under review is correct and preferable.
Court Disposition
The decision under review is affirmed.
Orders
- ['The decision under review is affirmed.' 'Pursuant to s 64(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), the Confidential Affidavit of Lauren Berrell is not to be published or released to the Applicant or the public.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment