Hill v Hill [2004] NSWSC 1205
Mr Hill is entitled to protection for any equitable claim arising from improvements, but Mrs Hill’s undertaking to hold proceeds in trust provides sufficient protection. The caveat should be removed under s.74MA, and Mrs Hill is entitled to vacant possession, with Mr Hill allowed fourteen days to vacate.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: June Dorothy Hill; Defendant: Peter Russell Hill
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Order for Removal of Caveat / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Order for removal of caveat made; order for vacant possession granted.
- Legal Topics
- Caveats, Removal of Caveat, Interests in Land, Constructive Trust, Vacant Possession
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
June Dorothy Hill
Plaintiff
Peter Russell Hill
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Order for Removal of Caveat / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the caveat registered by Mr Hill should be removed under s.74MA of the Real Property Act 1900
- 2 Whether Mr Hill has an equitable interest in the property or proceeds of sale
- 3 Whether Mrs Hill is entitled to vacant possession
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Hill is entitled to protection for any equitable claim arising from improvements, but Mrs Hill’s undertaking to hold proceeds in trust provides sufficient protection. The caveat should be removed under s.74MA, and Mrs Hill is entitled to vacant possession, with Mr Hill allowed fourteen days to vacate.
Court Disposition
Order for removal of caveat made; order for vacant possession granted.
Orders
- Order for removal of caveat registered by Mr Hill against property title under s.74MA Real Property Act 1900.
- Order for vacant possession granted to Mrs Hill.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment