Strykowski v Waverley Council [2020] NSWLEC 1334
The amended written request and proposal justify non-compliance with the floor space ratio development standard, comply with the objectives of the standard and the R2 zoning, and are consistent with public interest, thus the variation and development consent is upheld.
- Parties
- Applicant: June Strykowski; Respondent: Waverley Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted with variation to floor space ratio standard.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Conciliation Conference, Variation of Development Standard, Floor Space Ratio, Development Consent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
June Strykowski
Applicant
Waverley Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Conciliation Conference and Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the development application for demolition and construction meets the planning standards and can be approved with variation to floor space ratio
- 2 Whether the conditions and written request satisfy the requirements for variation under cl 4.6 of Waverley Local Environmental Plan 2012
Ratio Decidendi
The amended written request and proposal justify non-compliance with the floor space ratio development standard, comply with the objectives of the standard and the R2 zoning, and are consistent with public interest, thus the variation and development consent is upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted with variation to floor space ratio standard.
Orders
- Leave granted to amend development application and rely on specified plans/documents.
- Applicant's written request seeking variation of floor space ratio standard is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment