IND V. SCOTCH COLLEGE 4/1927
The evidence led on behalf of the appellant, weighed against the inherent improbabilities, the prior behaviour and condition of the deceased, and the suspicious circumstances surrounding the will's execution, was not sufficiently credible to discharge the burden of proof that Mrs. Ingerson executed the document as her last will. The trial judge, having seen and heard the witnesses, was not satisfied as to the truth of their story, and there is no basis for the appellate court to overturn that finding.
- Parties
- Appellant: Jupem; Respondent: Ind; Respondent: Scotch
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 1927
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Will, Testamentary Capacity, Burden of Proof, Probate Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jupem
Appellant
Ind
Respondent
Scotch
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant has proved that Mrs. Ingerson executed the document of 9 November 1925 as her last will
- 2 Whether the testimony supporting the will's execution is credible and sufficient to discharge the burden of proof
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence led on behalf of the appellant, weighed against the inherent improbabilities, the prior behaviour and condition of the deceased, and the suspicious circumstances surrounding the will's execution, was not sufficiently credible to discharge the burden of proof that Mrs. Ingerson executed the document as her last will. The trial judge, having seen and heard the witnesses, was not satisfied as to the truth of their story, and there is no basis for the appellate court to overturn that finding.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment