JUPP v YOUNG [1992] NSWCA 121
The appropriate course is to refer the matter to the court as previously constituted to determine the issues, rather than pre-empt that court's purposes.
- Parties
- Applicant: Jupp; Respondent: Young; Other: Pamela Jill Jackman; Unknown: Mr Kalfas
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Directions/contempt Proceedings / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Matter stood over
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Party arguments 1
Parties
Jupp
Applicant
Young
Respondent
Pamela Jill Jackman
Other
Mr Kalfas
Unknown
Procedural Posture
Motion for Directions/contempt Proceedings / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper procedure for further steps regarding motion for committal for contempt
- 2 Clarification of previous order due to financial circumstances of Pamela Jill Jackman
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate course is to refer the matter to the court as previously constituted to determine the issues, rather than pre-empt that court's purposes.
Court Disposition
Matter stood over
Orders
- Matter stood over to a date to be fixed by the Registrar for determination by the court as previously constituted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment