MILLER v OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY AND EDWARDS [1997] NSWCA 203

MILLER v OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY AND EDWARDS [1997] NSWCA 203

Leave to appeal is refused because there is insufficient prospect of success on the proposed challenges, and the incomplete litigation should proceed to final judgment before appellate review. The Supreme Court was entitled to set aside consent orders due to lack of jurisdiction under the De Facto Relationships Act or on the ground of common mistake as to the parties' marital status, and the bankruptcy trustee had standing.

Parties
Claimant: Miller; First Opponent: Official Trustee in Bankruptcy; Second Opponent: Edwards
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 July 1997
Procedural Posture
Summons for Leave to Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Leave to Appeal; Interlocutory Stage
Outcome
Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction to Set Aside Consent Orders, Validity of Foreign Marriages, Standing of Bankruptcy Trustee, Effect of Common Mistake, De Facto Relationships Property Orders
Bankruptcy Family Law Civil Procedure Jurisdiction to Set Aside Consent Orders Validity of Foreign Marriages Standing of Bankruptcy Trustee Effect of Common Mistake De Facto Relationships Property Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Miller

Claimant

Official Trustee in Bankruptcy

First Opponent

Edwards

Second Opponent

Procedural Posture

Summons for Leave to Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Leave to Appeal; Interlocutory Stage

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Court had jurisdiction to set aside consent orders made under the De Facto Relationships Act 1984
  2. 2 Whether the existence of a valid undissolved foreign marriage affected jurisdiction under the De Facto Relationships Act
  3. 3 Whether the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy had standing to seek to set aside past property orders and revest property

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal is refused because there is insufficient prospect of success on the proposed challenges, and the incomplete litigation should proceed to final judgment before appellate review. The Supreme Court was entitled to set aside consent orders due to lack of jurisdiction under the De Facto Relationships Act or on the ground of common mistake as to the parties' marital status, and the bankruptcy trustee had standing.

Court Disposition

Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Summons dismissed with costs.