REGINA v. PARK [1999] NSWSC 988
Despite the fractured process and interruptions caused mainly by difficulties with the arrival of a key witness, my observation of the jury does not indicate any diversion from their task, and a discharge is not presently warranted; however, further disruptions may change this assessment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial / Application to Discharge Jury
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['jury Discharge' 'trial Fairness' 'mutual Assistance Agreements' 'statutory Immunity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial / Application to Discharge Jury
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the jury should be discharged due to interruptions and fractured trial process' 'Whether the defence has sufficient material to cross-examine the witness from Korea' 'Impact of statutory immunities and mutual assistance agreements on trial fairness']
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the fractured process and interruptions caused mainly by difficulties with the arrival of a key witness, my observation of the jury does not indicate any diversion from their task, and a discharge is not presently warranted; however, further disruptions may change this assessment.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment