R v Davis [2003] NSWCCA 79
The sentence imposed for the aggravated break and enter was unduly disproportionate to the co-offender's sentence given the age gap and different subjective factors, and some regard should have been paid to the co-offender's sentence; therefore the head sentence and non parole period should be reduced.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Applicant: Justin Andrew Davis
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed in respect of aggravated break and enter sentence; head sentence and non parole period reduced; other sentence undisturbed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Appeal, Aggravated Break and Enter, Assessment of Parity, Discount for Plea of Guilty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Justin Andrew Davis
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant was unduly disproportionate to the co-offender's sentence
- 2 Whether sufficient consideration was given to parity between sentences
- 3 Appropriateness of the discount for plea of guilty
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed for the aggravated break and enter was unduly disproportionate to the co-offender's sentence given the age gap and different subjective factors, and some regard should have been paid to the co-offender's sentence; therefore the head sentence and non parole period should be reduced.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed in respect of aggravated break and enter sentence; head sentence and non parole period reduced; other sentence undisturbed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Appeal allowed in respect only of the sentence imposed for aggravated break and enter and commission of a serious indictable offence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment