Buckwell v Woollahra Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 1545
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision and made the agreed final orders.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application/modification Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Final Orders Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Modification Application 553/2011/3 approved subject to conditions; Development application DA 553/2011 modified in accordance with the modification application and conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'modification Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'orders Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application/modification Appeal / Conciliation Conference; Final Orders Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the agreement reached between the parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.' 'Whether the decision agreed by the parties was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision and made the agreed final orders.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Modification Application 553/2011/3 approved subject to conditions; Development application DA 553/2011 modified in accordance with the modification application and conditions.
Orders
- ['The applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended plans referred to in condition A.6 of Annexure "A".' 'Appeal is upheld.' 'Modification Application 553/2011/3 for carport and driveway at 1/7 Salisbury Street, Watsons Bay is approved subject to the conditions at Annexure "A".' 'Development application DA...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment