Gill v Wollondilly Shire Council [2021] NSWLEC 1060
The Court, being satisfied that the parties’ agreement constitutes a decision it could have made in exercise of its functions, upheld the appeal and substituted the Development Control Order as agreed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['development Control Order' 'conciliation' 'agreement' 'substituted Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Development Control Order dated 10 October 2019 should be substituted' "Whether the parties' agreement to substitute the order is one the Court could have made"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court, being satisfied that the parties’ agreement constitutes a decision it could have made in exercise of its functions, upheld the appeal and substituted the Development Control Order as agreed.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The Court orders that Development Control Order dated 10 October 2019 be substituted with Order 11 of Part 1 of the Table to Schedule 5 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 pursuant to ss 9.34 and 9.35 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in respect of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment