JV v R [2017] NSWCCA 49
The decision not to lead evidence of good character was a legitimate and rational forensic choice by counsel, since doing so would have led to the admission of damaging rebuttal evidence from NP. The applicant was not deprived of a fair chance of acquittal, and no miscarriage of justice resulted from counsel's conduct. Leave to appeal was granted, but the appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['conviction Appeal' 'good Character Evidence' 'miscarriage of Justice' 'forensic Decisions by Counsel' 'sexual Offences Against Children']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant's trial miscarried due to failure of his counsel to lead evidence of good character" 'Whether decision not to adduce good character evidence was legitimate forensic choice' 'Whether evidence of a further complaint would have been admissible to rebut character evidence' 'Whether the absence of character evidence deprived the applicant of a fair trial']
Ratio Decidendi
The decision not to lead evidence of good character was a legitimate and rational forensic choice by counsel, since doing so would have led to the admission of damaging rebuttal evidence from NP. The applicant was not deprived of a fair chance of acquittal, and no miscarriage of justice resulted from counsel's conduct. Leave to appeal was granted, but the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['(1) Grant leave to appeal.' '(2) Dismiss the appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment