"JX" v "GX" & 3 Ors [2005] NSWSC 114

"JX" v "GX" & 3 Ors [2005] NSWSC 114

The plaintiff did not satisfy any of the s 60I(1)(a) threshold gateways. He knew well before 2000 that he had suffered personal injuries from the sexual abuse, was aware of the nature or extent of his personal injury by 1998 at the latest, and failed to establish unawareness of the connection between the personal injury and the first defendant's acts or omissions. The notice of motion for an extension of the limitation period was therefore dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 February 2005
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Maintain Proceedings Under the Limitation Act 1969 (nsw) / Notice of Motion Filed 23 March 2004
Outcome
The plaintiff's notice of motion filed 23 March 2004 was dismissed and costs were reserved.
Legal Topics
['extension of Limitation Period' 'sexual Assault Allegations' 'personal Injury Damages' 'conveyancing Act Transfer Set Aside' 'fraudulent Conveyance']
['limitation of Actions' 'personal Injury' 'torts' 'equitable Relief'] ['extension of Limitation Period' 'sexual Assault Allegations' 'personal Injury Damages' 'conveyancing Act Transfer Set Aside' 'fraudulent Conveyance']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Maintain Proceedings Under the Limitation Act 1969 (nsw) / Notice of Motion Filed 23 March 2004

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff satisfied the threshold requirements in s 60I(1)(a) of the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW).' 'Whether the plaintiff did not know that personal injury had been suffered at the expiration of the relevant limitation period or at a time before that expiration when proceedings might reasonably have been instituted.' 'Whether the plaintiff was unaware of the nature or extent of the personal injury suffered.' "Whether the plaintiff was unaware of the connection between the personal injury and the first defendant's acts or omissions." 'If the threshold requirements were met, whether it was just and reasonable to extend the limitation period.' 'Whether pleaded equitable relief concerning the transfer of property may be statute barred.']

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff did not satisfy any of the s 60I(1)(a) threshold gateways. He knew well before 2000 that he had suffered personal injuries from the sexual abuse, was aware of the nature or extent of his personal injury by 1998 at the latest, and failed to establish unawareness of the connection between the personal injury and the first defendant's acts or omissions. The notice of motion for an extension of the limitation period was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

The plaintiff's notice of motion filed 23 March 2004 was dismissed and costs were reserved.

Orders

  • ["The plaintiff's notice of motion filed 23 March 2004 is dismissed." 'Costs are reserved.']