Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v El Ali, Khoder (No 1) [2014] NSWLC 28
The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions had lawful authority to carry on the committal proceedings for State firearm offences (not requiring to have 'instituted' such proceedings) pursuant to ss 6(1)(m) and 17 of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1983 (Cth) and corresponding instruments of consent and delegation from the NSW Director of Public Prosecutions. Thus, the CDPP's conduct of proceedings was valid and the NSWDPP did not fail to appear for the committal hearing.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth); Solicitor for the Prosecution: Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth); Defendant: K El Ali; Solicitor for the Defendant: Hanna Legal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Committal Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; prosecution may continue.
- Legal Topics
- Director of Public Prosecutions Powers, Jurisdiction, Committal Proceedings, Agency, Procedural Rulings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth)
Prosecution
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth)
Solicitor for the Prosecution
K El Ali
Defendant
Hanna Legal
Solicitor for the Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Committal Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions had power to carry on proceedings on behalf of the NSW Director of Public Prosecutions for State firearm offences
- 2 Interpretation of ss 6(1)(m) and 17 of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1983 (Cth)
- 3 Whether agency or incidental powers under the Act or related regulations permit conduct of State proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions had lawful authority to carry on the committal proceedings for State firearm offences (not requiring to have 'instituted' such proceedings) pursuant to ss 6(1)(m) and 17 of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1983 (Cth) and corresponding instruments of consent and delegation from the NSW Director of Public Prosecutions. Thus, the CDPP's conduct of proceedings was valid and the NSWDPP did not fail to appear for the committal hearing.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; prosecution may continue.
Orders
- That the NSW Director of Public Prosecutions did not fail to appear at the committal hearing.
- That the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions did have the lawful authority to carry on the committal proceedings for the State firearm offences and in doing so appear for the NSW Director of Public Prosecutions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment