K -v- Minister for Community Services [1999] NSWADT 25
Despite indications that F wishes to return to her father's care, consistent and independent expert evidence supported that her welfare and best interests are promoted by remaining a ward. The applicant lacks necessary insight and capacity to provide a nurturing and safe environment. Therefore, the decision to refuse to terminate the guardianship is affirmed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Guardianship Review / Principal Matter; Review of Administrative Decision
- Outcome
- Decision affirmed; Minister's guardianship not terminated
- Legal Topics
- ['guardianship Termination' 'child Welfare' 'best Interests of the Child']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Guardianship Review / Principal Matter; Review of Administrative Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether it would promote the welfare and be in the interests of the child, F, to restore her to the care of her natural father' "Whether the minister's guardianship of F should be terminated"]
Ratio Decidendi
Despite indications that F wishes to return to her father's care, consistent and independent expert evidence supported that her welfare and best interests are promoted by remaining a ward. The applicant lacks necessary insight and capacity to provide a nurturing and safe environment. Therefore, the decision to refuse to terminate the guardianship is affirmed.
Court Disposition
Decision affirmed; Minister's guardianship not terminated
Orders
- ["The decision made by the delegate of the Minister for Community Services under s 112(1)(e) of the Children (Care and Protection) Act 1987, to refuse to terminate the Minister's guardianship of F, is affirmed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment