K. v The Queen [1983] FCA 249
The sentencing judge failed to give sufficient weight to the appellant's plea of guilty, remorse, co-operation with authorities, and previous good character. In view of these factors and the circumstances of the offence, the sentence imposed by the lower court was manifestly excessive and should be reduced, with a significant portion suspended.
- Parties
- Appellant: K; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; sentence varied
- Legal Topics
- Severity of Sentence, Incestuous Rape, Plea of Guilty, Suspended Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K
Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Severity of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Proper weight to be given to plea of guilty, contrition, and co-operation
- 3 Appropriate consideration of impact on victim and risk of reoffending
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge failed to give sufficient weight to the appellant's plea of guilty, remorse, co-operation with authorities, and previous good character. In view of these factors and the circumstances of the offence, the sentence imposed by the lower court was manifestly excessive and should be reduced, with a significant portion suspended.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; sentence varied
Orders
- The appeal be upheld and the sentence imposed on 26 May 1983 be set aside.
- The accused be sentenced to imprisonment with hard labour for five years, commencing upon 26 May 1983.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment