Kai-Tian Group Kogarah Pty Ltd v Georges River Council [2021] NSWLEC 1271
The Court upheld the appeal and granted consent because the parties' agreed decision was one the Court could make: the amended residential flat building was permissible with consent in the R4 High Density Residential zone, the clause 4.6 request adequately justified the minor height exceedance and satisfied the relevant public interest and objective tests, heritage, contamination, BASIX and design quality matters were satisfactorily addressed, no submissions were received to the amended proposal, and the amended proposal could be granted consent under s 4.15(1) and s 4.16 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Under S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application Da/2017/0597 / Conciliation Conference Under S 34 a of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Final Agreed Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; clause 4.6 variation request upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions; Applicant ordered to pay agreed costs thrown away.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application Appeal' 'residential Flat Building' 'clause 4.6 Variation Request' 'building Height Development Standard' 'conciliation Agreement' 'development Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Under S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application Da/2017/0597 / Conciliation Conference Under S 34 a of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Final Agreed Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the amended proposal was permissible with consent in the R4 High Density Residential zone under the Kogarah Local Environmental Plan 2012.' "Whether the Applicant's clause 4.6 written request justified variation of the height of buildings development standard in clause 4.3 of the Kogarah Local Environmental Plan 2012." 'Whether heritage conservation, remediation of land, BASIX and design quality requirements were satisfactorily addressed.' 'Whether consent should be granted to Development Application DA/2017/0597 under s 4.15(1) and s 4.16 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court upheld the appeal and granted consent because the parties' agreed decision was one the Court could make: the amended residential flat building was permissible with consent in the R4 High Density Residential zone, the clause 4.6 request adequately justified the minor height exceedance and satisfied the relevant public interest and objective tests, heritage, contamination, BASIX and design quality matters were satisfactorily addressed, no submissions were received to the amended proposal, and the amended proposal could be granted consent under s 4.15(1) and s 4.16 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; clause 4.6 variation request upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions; Applicant ordered to pay agreed costs thrown away.
Orders
- ["Pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away in the agreed amount of $5,000 within 14 days of these orders being made." "The Applicant's written request under clause 4.6 of the Kogarah Local Environmental Plan 2012,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment