Barnett v R [2014] NSWCCA 296
The sentencing judge's finding that the applicant was inattentive for a significant period of time was open on the evidence and was not shown to depend on the arithmetic error identified in the sentencing remarks. The proposed mathematical reconstruction of the period of inattention was artificial and did not...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Aggregate Sentence Following Conviction by Jury
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['dangerous Driving Occasioning Death' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'momentary Inattention' 'failure to Maintain a Proper Lookout']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Aggregate Sentence Following Conviction by Jury
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge erred in finding that the applicant's conduct was not a case of momentary inattention." 'Whether factual or arithmetic errors in the sentencing remarks caused the sentencing discretion to miscarry.']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge's finding that the applicant was inattentive for a significant period of time was open on the evidence and was not shown to depend on the arithmetic error identified in the sentencing remarks. The proposed mathematical reconstruction of the period of inattention was artificial and did not reflect the fact-finding exercise undertaken by the sentencing judge. The additional alleged factual errors did not establish that the sentencing discretion miscarried.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment