KALACHIAN v JORGENSON [1996] NSWCA 287
The Master did not err in his assessment of damages, preference for medical testimony, or evaluation of the appellant's credibility; the findings were supported by the evidence, and appellate interference is unwarranted.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kalachian; Respondent: Jorgenson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Motor Vehicle Accident, Economic Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, Medical Evidence, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Parties
Kalachian
Appellant
Jorgenson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Master's assessment of damages for economic loss and loss of earning capacity was appropriate
- 2 Whether the Master erred in evaluating or rejecting medical evidence, specifically that of Dr Middleton
- 3 Whether the Master erred in rejecting the appellant's evidence regarding intentions to work
Ratio Decidendi
The Master did not err in his assessment of damages, preference for medical testimony, or evaluation of the appellant's credibility; the findings were supported by the evidence, and appellate interference is unwarranted.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment