KALACHIAN v JORGENSON [1996] NSWCA 287

KALACHIAN v JORGENSON [1996] NSWCA 287

The Master did not err in his assessment of damages, preference for medical testimony, or evaluation of the appellant's credibility; the findings were supported by the evidence, and appellate interference is unwarranted.

Parties
Appellant: Kalachian; Respondent: Jorgenson
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 May 1996
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Motor Vehicle Accident, Economic Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, Medical Evidence, Assessment of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kalachian

Appellant

Jorgenson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Decision on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Master's assessment of damages for economic loss and loss of earning capacity was appropriate
  2. 2 Whether the Master erred in evaluating or rejecting medical evidence, specifically that of Dr Middleton
  3. 3 Whether the Master erred in rejecting the appellant's evidence regarding intentions to work

Ratio Decidendi

The Master did not err in his assessment of damages, preference for medical testimony, or evaluation of the appellant's credibility; the findings were supported by the evidence, and appellate interference is unwarranted.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.