Karout v Stratton & Ors [2008] NSWCA 237
Given the technical nature of the irregularities in execution of the warrants, and the availability of a discretion under s 138 of the Evidence Act for admission of any resulting evidence, it is a matter properly for the Magistrate, and not appropriate for leave to appeal to be granted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Kaldon Karout; First Respondent: Constable Matthew Stratton; Second Respondent: James Wiseman; Third Respondent: Rory Evans
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal, Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Irregular Execution of Warrants, Admission of Illegally Obtained Evidence, Police Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kaldon Karout
Applicant
Constable Matthew Stratton
First Respondent
James Wiseman
Second Respondent
Rory Evans
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Court of Appeal, Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted in relation to the execution of two warrants
- 2 Whether technical irregularities in execution of a search warrant impact admissibility of evidence
- 3 Whether an incomplete Notice to Occupiers invalidates execution of a warrant or evidence obtained
Ratio Decidendi
Given the technical nature of the irregularities in execution of the warrants, and the availability of a discretion under s 138 of the Evidence Act for admission of any resulting evidence, it is a matter properly for the Magistrate, and not appropriate for leave to appeal to be granted.
Court Disposition
Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The summons for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment