Kaldon Karout v Constable Mathew Stratton & Ors [2007] NSWSC 1034
The Court held that both search warrants were validly issued and executed; any breach regarding the announcement before entry or the form of the Occupier's Notice amounted only to a technical defect that did not invalidate the warrants or searches, particularly given the plaintiff's actual awareness of police powers and process, and valid consent to continued police presence between expiry and re-issue of the warrant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['search Warrants' 'validity of Warrants' 'execution of Warrants' 'law Enforcement (powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002' 'consent in Search and Seizure' "occupier's Notice"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Was the first search warrant validly executed?' 'Was the second search warrant validly issued?' 'Was the second search warrant validly executed?']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that both search warrants were validly issued and executed; any breach regarding the announcement before entry or the form of the Occupier's Notice amounted only to a technical defect that did not invalidate the warrants or searches, particularly given the plaintiff's actual awareness of police powers and process, and valid consent to continued police presence between expiry and re-issue of the warrant.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's summons dismissed
Orders
- ["The plaintiff's summons is dismissed." "The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the summons."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment