Kamal Deep Arora v Blacktown City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1338
The appeal was upheld because expert evidence established that the amended application and conditions satisfactorily addressed amenity concerns, and strict compliance with the 1 km distance separation control was unnecessary given the need and context of the new release area and the draft SEPP, which removes such controls.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'childcare Centre' 'distance Separation Control' 'cumulative Amenity Impacts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Variation of the 1 km distance separation control in the Development Control Plan (DCP)' 'Acceptability of cumulative amenity impacts of two childcare centres']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was upheld because expert evidence established that the amended application and conditions satisfactorily addressed amenity concerns, and strict compliance with the 1 km distance separation control was unnecessary given the need and context of the new release area and the draft SEPP, which removes such controls.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted
Orders
- ['Appeal upheld.' 'Development consent is granted to DA 15/02702 for construction of a single storey childcare centre accommodating 42 places, associated parking and landscaping at lots 459,460 and 461 DP 1198882 37 – 41 Barrington Street, The Ponds in accordance with the amended application in Exhibit A and the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment