Vinod, Kamal v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs & Anor [1996] FCA 735
The 28 day period under s.478(1)(b) of the Migration Act for filing an application for review runs from the date of actual notification of the Tribunal's decision to the applicant. The Court has no power to extend this period under s.478(2). Regulation 5.03 does not operate to deem notification for the purposes of s.478(1)(b)—actual receipt or the statutory presumption of time of delivery applies.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Interlocutory (timeliness/extension of Time to File Application)
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'extension of Time' 'notification of Decision' 'refugee Status Determination']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Interlocutory (timeliness/extension of Time to File Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the application for judicial review was filed within the statutory 28 day time limit under s.478(1)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether the Court has power to extend the 28 day period prescribed for filing an application for review under s.478(2)' "How and when 'notification' of the tribunal decision occurs for time calculation purposes"]
Ratio Decidendi
The 28 day period under s.478(1)(b) of the Migration Act for filing an application for review runs from the date of actual notification of the Tribunal's decision to the applicant. The Court has no power to extend this period under s.478(2). Regulation 5.03 does not operate to deem notification for the purposes of s.478(1)(b)—actual receipt or the statutory presumption of time of delivery applies.
Court Disposition
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment