Dallow v Ferguson [2021] FCA 1124
Although the applicant provided an acceptable explanation for delay and the short delay caused no prejudice, the proposed appeal lacked reasonable prospects of success on all grounds as the sentencing judge had applied correct principles, properly characterised the contempts, considered relevant aggravating and mitigating factors, and the sentence was consistent with comparable cases. Consequently, the extension of time was refused and the application was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time refused; application dismissed; costs to respondent.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time for Appeal' 'contempt of Court' 'sentencing' 'criteria for Exercise of Discretion' 'civil Vs Criminal Contempt']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time for Leave to Appeal / Decision on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file a notice of appeal against sentence for contempt of court' "Whether the applicant's grounds raise any reasonable prospects of success on appeal"]
Ratio Decidendi
Although the applicant provided an acceptable explanation for delay and the short delay caused no prejudice, the proposed appeal lacked reasonable prospects of success on all grounds as the sentencing judge had applied correct principles, properly characterised the contempts, considered relevant aggravating and mitigating factors, and the sentence was consistent with comparable cases. Consequently, the extension of time was refused and the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time refused; application dismissed; costs to respondent.
Orders
- ["The applicant's application for an extension of time under r 36.05 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) in which to file a notice of appeal be dismissed." "The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application on a lump sum basis in an amount to be agreed or in default of agreement such lump sum be fixed by...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment