Kansanto Pty Ltd v Fairfield City Council (No 2) [2022] NSWLEC 1272

The reference to 'DA 21/57' in the original judgment was an accidental slip, and it is appropriate to correct it to 'DA 292.1/2021' in accordance with Rule 36.17.

Parties: Applicant: Kansanto Pty Ltd; Respondent: Fairfield City Council
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 30 May 2022
Procedural Posture: Class 1 / Ruling on Amendment of Judgment
Outcome: Judgment amended to correct clerical error
Legal Topics: Amendment of Judgment, Clerical Error, Accidental Slip or Omission

Civil Procedure Amendment of Judgment Clerical Error Accidental Slip or Omission

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Kansanto Pty Ltd

Applicant

Fairfield City Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Class 1 / Ruling on Amendment of Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the judgment should be amended to correct a clerical mistake regarding development application reference

Ratio Decidendi

The reference to 'DA 21/57' in the original judgment was an accidental slip, and it is appropriate to correct it to 'DA 292.1/2021' in accordance with Rule 36.17.

Court Disposition

Judgment amended to correct clerical error

Orders

Pursuant to Rule 36.17 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, the judgment in Kansanto Pty Ltd v Fairfield City Council [2022] NSWLEC 1256 is amended by replacing the reference to 'DA 21/57' in order 2 and paragraph 15(1) with 'DA 292.1/2021'.