KARA KAR HOLDINGS PTY LTD and ORS v BROOKTON HOLDINGS and ORS [1997] NSWCA 171

KARA KAR HOLDINGS PTY LTD and ORS v BROOKTON HOLDINGS and ORS [1997] NSWCA 171

Where a matter properly raised has not been determined at first instance and procedural fairness is denied, appellate intervention is warranted; an appeal was allowed and the matter remitted for rehearing as the trial judge failed to rule on a substantive issue central to the parties' rights.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Kara Kar Holdings Pty Ltd; Appellant: Mr Yardy; Appellant: Mrs Yardy; Respondent: Brookton Holdings No 5 Pty Ltd; Respondent: Mr Knudsen; Respondent: Mrs Knudsen
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 March 1997
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment and Interlocutory Order; Remitted for New Trial
Outcome
Appeals allowed; leave and extension of time granted; matter remitted for rehearing.
Legal Topics
Breach of Trust, Procedural Fairness, Corporate Winding Up, Trust Administration, Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal
Equity Corporations Trusts Civil Procedure Breach of Trust Procedural Fairness Corporate Winding Up Trust Administration +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 25 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kara Kar Holdings Pty Ltd

Appellant

Mr Yardy

Appellant

Mrs Yardy

Appellant

Brookton Holdings No 5 Pty Ltd

Respondent

Mr Knudsen

Respondent

Mrs Knudsen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment and Interlocutory Order; Remitted for New Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal was required from interlocutory orders
  2. 2 Whether a breach of trust occurred in the administration of the pension fund
  3. 3 Whether there was an implied or express determination by the trustee regarding distribution

Ratio Decidendi

Where a matter properly raised has not been determined at first instance and procedural fairness is denied, appellate intervention is warranted; an appeal was allowed and the matter remitted for rehearing as the trial judge failed to rule on a substantive issue central to the parties' rights.

Court Disposition

Appeals allowed; leave and extension of time granted; matter remitted for rehearing.

Orders

  • Extend the time in which to file a notice of appeal from decision of Young J dated 13 April 1994 to 27 March 1997.
  • Grant leave to appeal from decision of Young J dated 4 September 1996.