Karakatsis Holdings Pty Ltd v City of Sydney [2019] NSWLEC 1273
The parties reached agreement to uphold the appeal and grant consent to the modification application. The Court was satisfied, on the amended plans, supporting documents and proposed conditions, that there were no jurisdictional impediments, the proposal satisfied s 4.55(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The proceedings therefore had to be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Modification Application D/2017/994/c / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Between the Parties; Orders Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; consent granted to modification application D/2017/994/C subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'development Consent' 'dual Occupancy Development' 'floor Space Ratio' 'sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012' 'sydney Development Control Plan 2012']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Modification Application D/2017/994/c / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Between the Parties; Orders Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court could make orders by agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979' 'Whether modification application D/2017/994/C satisfied the requirements of s 4.55(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'Whether the amended plans and proposed conditions were consistent with the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 and Sydney Development Control Plan 2012' 'Whether the proposed modification was substantially the same as the approved development and caused further environmental impact']
Ratio Decidendi
The parties reached agreement to uphold the appeal and grant consent to the modification application. The Court was satisfied, on the amended plans, supporting documents and proposed conditions, that there were no jurisdictional impediments, the proposal satisfied s 4.55(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The proceedings therefore had to be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; consent granted to modification application D/2017/994/C subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans contained at Annexure A.' 'The Appeal is upheld.' 'Consent is granted to modification application D/2017/994/C modify Development Consent D/2017/994 to add an ensuite bathroom to Bedroom 2 of Apartment 2 to the approved dual occupancy development at 1...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment