Carey-Hazell v Getz Bros & Co (Aust) Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 116
Leave to further amend the statement of claim was refused because the proposed amended economic loss figures depended on income assumptions and expert material that had not been shown to be admissible or properly proved; there was no admissible evidence otherwise supporting the amendment sought.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Further Amend Statement of Claim / Hearing of Application for Leave to Further Amend Claim for Economic Loss
- Outcome
- Leave to further amend the statement of claim refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Amend' 'expert Evidence' 'hearsay' 'economic Loss' 'admissibility of Evidence']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Further Amend Statement of Claim / Hearing of Application for Leave to Further Amend Claim for Economic Loss
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether leave should be granted to further amend the statement of claim to change the sums and calculation method for the applicant's claimed economic loss." 'Whether the proposed expert evidence from Mr Calder and Mr Pike provided an admissible evidentiary basis for the proposed amendments.' 'Whether hearsay material and information from salary surveys and companies could support the claimed income figures.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to further amend the statement of claim was refused because the proposed amended economic loss figures depended on income assumptions and expert material that had not been shown to be admissible or properly proved; there was no admissible evidence otherwise supporting the amendment sought.
Court Disposition
Leave to further amend the statement of claim refused.
Orders
- ['Leave to further amend the statement of claim is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment