Kline v Official Secretary to the Governor-General [2012] FCAFC 184
Documents relating to the substantive powers and functions of the Governor-General, such as those concerning nominations, awards, and administration of the Order of Australia, are not documents of an administrative nature for the purposes of s 6A of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth), and are therefore excluded from the Act's application.
- Parties
- Applicant: Karen Kline; First Respondent: Official Secretary to the Governor-General; Second Respondent: Registrar, Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Access to Government Documents, Scope of Freedom of Information Act, Administrative Nature of Documents, Governor General's Substantive Functions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Karen Kline
Applicant
Official Secretary to the Governor-General
First Respondent
Registrar, Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether documents held by the Official Secretary to the Governor-General relating to the Order of Australia are of an 'administrative nature' for the purposes of s 6A of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth)
- 2 Proper construction and application of s 6A of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
Documents relating to the substantive powers and functions of the Governor-General, such as those concerning nominations, awards, and administration of the Order of Australia, are not documents of an administrative nature for the purposes of s 6A of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth), and are therefore excluded from the Act's application.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed.
- The applicant pay the first respondent's costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment