Schuler v Stern [2014] NSWDC 85

Schuler v Stern [2014] NSWDC 85

The condition precedent in the costs agreement was satisfied as junior counsel accepted a brief on hearing; accordingly, the agreement was effective and payment of costs was due. A successful outcome for the purpose of the agreement was achieved when a settlement was reached against the first defendant, entitling the solicitor to costs. The Review Panel did not err in its findings, and any inadequacy of reasons was not determinative given the evidence before the court.

Parties
Plaintiff: Karen Linda Schuler; Defendant: Terence Stern
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 July 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Costs Review Panel Decision Under S 384(1) Legal Profession Act 2004 (nsw)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Conditional Costs Agreements, Costs Assessment, Condition Precedent, Successful Outcome Definition, Professional Conduct
Legal Practice Contract Conditional Costs Agreements Costs Assessment Condition Precedent Successful Outcome Definition Professional Conduct

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Karen Linda Schuler

Plaintiff

Terence Stern

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Costs Review Panel Decision Under S 384(1) Legal Profession Act 2004 (nsw)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the condition precedent in the costs agreement (that counsel accept a brief to both advise and appear at the hearing) was fulfilled
  2. 2 Whether the Review Panel erred in stating that 'successful outcome' was not in dispute
  3. 3 Whether the former solicitor needed to establish that any successful outcome related to work carried out by him

Ratio Decidendi

The condition precedent in the costs agreement was satisfied as junior counsel accepted a brief on hearing; accordingly, the agreement was effective and payment of costs was due. A successful outcome for the purpose of the agreement was achieved when a settlement was reached against the first defendant, entitling the solicitor to costs. The Review Panel did not err in its findings, and any inadequacy of reasons was not determinative given the evidence before the court.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Extension of time for bringing the appeal granted
  • Appeal dismissed