McAuley v Northern Region Joint Regional Planning Panel (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 133

McAuley v Northern Region Joint Regional Planning Panel (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 133

The Third and Fourth Respondents were successful in the proceedings and the parties notified the Court that costs had been agreed, so a costs order was made by consent requiring the Applicant to pay their costs as agreed or assessed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 August 2013
Procedural Posture
Class 3 Costs / On the Papers; Costs Agreed Following Judgment
Outcome
By consent the Applicant must pay the costs of the proceedings of both the Third and Fourth Respondents, as agreed or assessed.
Legal Topics
['costs of Proceedings' 'consent Orders']
['costs'] ['costs of Proceedings' 'consent Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Class 3 Costs / On the Papers; Costs Agreed Following Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Applicant should pay the costs of the successful Third and Fourth Respondents.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Third and Fourth Respondents were successful in the proceedings and the parties notified the Court that costs had been agreed, so a costs order was made by consent requiring the Applicant to pay their costs as agreed or assessed.

Court Disposition

By consent the Applicant must pay the costs of the proceedings of both the Third and Fourth Respondents, as agreed or assessed.

Orders

  • ['By consent the Applicant must pay the costs of the proceedings of both the Third and Fourth Respondents, as agreed or assessed.']