Sony Computer Entertainment Australia Pty Ltd v Stirling [2001] FCA 784
The respondent was aware of the proceeding and elected not to appear or defend it. On the affidavit evidence, the applicants established the pleaded facts of trade mark infringement and contravention of the Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic). It was therefore appropriate to make declarations of infringement and contravention, injunctions restraining future infringement and contravention, and discovery and related orders to allow the applicants to elect between damages and an account of profits. The Court declined to declare breach of the 10 December 1999 undertaking because such a declaration had no utility and no enforceable contractual obligation had been pleaded.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Proceeding for Trade Mark Infringement and Contraventions of the Fair Trading Act 1999 (vic) Concerning CD Roms Containing Software for Use With Computer Game Players. / Notice of Motion for Judgment by Default of Appearance and Defence Under Order 11 Rule 23 of the Federal Court Rules; Liability Determined Before Pecuniary Relief.
- Outcome
- Default orders and declarations made for the applicants on liability; declaration concerning breach of undertaking declined; pecuniary relief left for later determination.
- Legal Topics
- ['registered Trade Mark Infringement' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'false Representations as to Sponsorship, Approval or Affiliation' 'default Judgment' 'injunctions' 'discovery' 'delivery Up' 'account of Profits or Damages']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Proceeding for Trade Mark Infringement and Contraventions of the Fair Trading Act 1999 (vic) Concerning CD Roms Containing Software for Use With Computer Game Players. / Notice of Motion for Judgment by Default of Appearance and Defence Under Order 11 Rule 23 of the Federal Court Rules; Liability Determined Before Pecuniary Relief.
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondent infringed the second applicant\'s registered trade mark number 642678 consisting of the mark "PlayStation".' 'Whether the respondent infringed the second applicant\'s registered trade mark number 642679 consisting of the mark "PS".' 'Whether the respondent breached ss 9, 10 and 12 of the Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic).' "Whether judgment and orders should be made in the respondent's absence under Order 11 Rule 23 of the Federal Court Rules." 'Whether a declaration should be made that the respondent breached an undertaking given on 10 December 1999.']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent was aware of the proceeding and elected not to appear or defend it. On the affidavit evidence, the applicants established the pleaded facts of trade mark infringement and contravention of the Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic). It was therefore appropriate to make declarations of infringement and contravention, injunctions restraining future infringement and contravention, and discovery and related orders to allow the applicants to elect between damages and an account of profits. The Court declined to declare breach of the 10 December 1999 undertaking because such a declaration had no utility and no enforceable contractual obligation had been pleaded.
Court Disposition
Default orders and declarations made for the applicants on liability; declaration concerning breach of undertaking declined; pecuniary relief left for later determination.
Orders
- ['In the absence of the respondent, the trial proceed generally.' 'The hearing and determination of liability take place before the hearing on all issues of pecuniary relief.' "The respondent has infringed the second applicant's registered trade mark number 642678." "The respondent has infringed the second...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment